Single-anonymous peer reviewĪll other IOPP journals operate the single-anonymous review process, in which reviewers know the identity of the authors but authors do not know the identity of the reviewers.
We ask our reviewers to undertake an objective review of an article and when agreeing to a double-anonymous review we trust that they will not go out of their way to undermine author anonymity. This does mean that author identities may be easier to find online if reviewers try to find them. IOP supports the early sharing of research results via preprint servers such as arXiv and other early sharing platforms. Is double-anonymous peer review compatible with the sharing of preprints? A checklist is available to help authors with this process and is also available in Chinese. New Journal of Physics gives authors the opportunity to choose whether their paper goes through double-anonymous or single-anonymous peer review.Īuthors are responsible for anonymising their manuscript before submitting their paper. Methods and Applications in Fluorescence.Machine Learning: Science and Technology.
Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics.Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics.Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical.International Journal of Extreme Manufacturing.Environmental Research: Infrastructure and Sustainability.Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express.The following journals operate a double-anonymous peer review model, in which authors remain anonymous to the reviewers throughout the review process. Our current peer review models on our journals are as follows: Double-anonymous peer review You can read more about these changes here. We are moving all of our owned journals to double-anonymous peer review by the end of 2021, making us the first physics publisher to adopt the approach portfolio-wide.